top of page

Watching the Watchdogs

After 13 years in the publishing industry, this was even a new one for me. Watchdog groups for writers organized by a writer. While watchdog groups can play a crucial role in monitoring and exposing misconduct, it is important to exercise caution and not blindly trust any organization claiming to be a watchdog. Here are a few reasons why one should approach watchdog groups with a degree of skepticism:

1. Bias: Watchdog groups, like any other organization or individual, can be influenced by their own biases and agendas. It is important to assess their funding sources, affiliations, and track records to understand any potential biases that might affect their objectivity. Some watchdog groups may be driven by political or ideological motivations, which can impact the way they interpret and present information or just bring attention to their “real” purposes or agenda. For example, an author with a group to "protect" writers...yeah sure you are.

2. Methodology and Accuracy: Watchdog groups may employ different methodologies and research techniques to collect and analyze data. It is essential to evaluate the rigor of their research methods and the accuracy of their findings. Scrutinize whether they follow accepted standards, adhere to ethical guidelines, and undergo independent verification processes.

3. Lack of Transparency: Transparency is vital for any trustworthy organization, including watchdog groups. If a watchdog group lacks transparency in its operations, such as its sources of funding, methodologies, or conflicts of interest, it becomes difficult to assess its credibility. Transparent organizations are more likely to earn public trust by allowing scrutiny of their work.

4. Overgeneralization: Watchdog groups, especially ones for writers, may sometimes draw broad conclusions or make sweeping statements based on limited evidence or isolated incidents. It is important to critically evaluate the scope and relevance of their claims and assess whether they adequately consider diverse perspectives and counterarguments.

5. Competing Agendas: In certain cases, watchdog groups may have conflicting agendas with the entities they are monitoring. This can introduce a potential bias that could impact the accuracy and fairness of their assessments. Understanding the broader context and motivations behind their work can help in evaluating their trustworthiness.

6. Lack of Accountability: While watchdog groups hold others accountable, it is essential for them to be held accountable as well. Look for watchdog groups that are open to feedback, address criticism constructively, and are willing to correct any mistakes they may have made. Organizations that lack mechanisms for accountability may raise doubts about their reliability.

While the above points highlight reasons for skepticism, it is important to note that some (not all) watchdog groups diligently work to promote transparency, ethics, and accountability. One group that is run by an author even had my company (linked to another company I had never heard of) carved on her “beware” list. (just a mustard seed amount of research could have solved this) But the focus with most of these watchdog companies is not accuracy but attention. While I found it to be laughable, it was still disturbing. Yet the dark brilliance of it all is that the woman who runs the blog/organization is, yes you guessed it, a writer. Needless to highlight, the blog, as fully intended, brings more attention to her novels. Note: Self-serving and public servants are first cousins. In summary, engaging with a variety of sources, critically evaluating information, and considering multiple perspectives can help in forming a more informed opinion.

15 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page